America makes its case against Russia

The White House also accused Russia of conducting “Potemkin diplomacy”—a reference to 18th-century Russian “Potemkin villages” with nothing behind them.

Fake diplomacy? That’s because while Russia claims to try to defuse the situation and back down, the US is seeing evidence to the contrary and warns that Russia may launch a false flag attack – something that inevitably To justify the invasion of Ukraine.

  • Claims of provocation in the Donbass region.
  • Claims of NATO activity on land or in the air.
  • Claims of infiltration into Russian territory.
  • False claims about mass graves, chemical or biological weapons activity, guerrilla activity or genocide.
Listen: Tensions rise over Russia-Ukraine conflict

Making a case. we Secretary of State Antony Blinken went to the United Nations on Thursday and presented the US case. He told the Security Council that Russia was laying the groundwork to justify starting the war and to prepare for an attack on Ukraine in the coming days.

“Today we are presenting it in great detail with the hope that by sharing what we know with the world, we can influence Russia to abandon the war path and choose a different path,” he said. while there is still time.”

RELATED: US says Russia plans to build justification for war
Blinken then traveled to Munich for a global security conference with Vice President Kamala Harris. She will meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg and other European leaders.

A kind of unity in America. While the US mission is to convince world powers that Russia is the aggressor and provide support to hold the country accountable, the US politics of the Russia-Ukraine situation is different.

Republicans and Democrats, for now, are relatively unified.

praise for biden Here’s what Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell was talking about on Wednesday about President Joe Biden’s comments earlier in the week:
What made the new, more aggressive Putin

McConnell said, “(Biden) was right to emphasize that if Vladimir Putin tries to invade his neighbour, or redraw the map of Europe through lethal force, the world will shrink.” Or will not stand idly.”

He added that Biden would have “overwhelming bipartisan support for using his current executive to push for tougher sanctions against Russia in the event of a conflict.”

But there is a difference between a bipartisan agreement and actual bipartisan action.

Blame Biden. While McConnell praised Biden and blessed his use of executive action, he blamed Biden for weakness in America’s withdrawal from Afghanistan, which he argued created a power vacuum.

“But as for the devastation in Afghanistan, there is no doubt in my mind – no doubt in my mind – that the Russians would not be on the border with Ukraine with 100,000 or more troops, had we not signaled to the rest of the world in Afghanistan. We’re pulling the plug and going home,” McConnell told reporters on Tuesday.

A failed ban attempt. Separately, lawmakers have so far failed to pass a bipartisan slate of sanctions against Russia.

A sanctions bill would not pass before the Russian invasion of Ukraine, if there should be one. Both the House and Senate are due out of session next week around the President’s Day holiday.

There are a number of differences between the parties, notably:

  • How to address the Nord Stream 2 natural gas pipeline, which Russia wants to set up around Ukraine to pump natural gas into Germany.
  • How to punish Russian bankers.

Senators were also looking to pass a resolution on unity against Russia’s aggression, but that too fell short, though it could still be passed on Thursday night. Instead, he issued a statement that did not require unanimous consent.

Democrats argue that the differences are technical.

Here’s where Sen. Tim Kaine, of Virginia, speaking on Capitol Hill on Thursday:

“We’ve actually agreed on the package,” Kaine told reporters. “It’s just that we have a different view on triggering sanctions – should we do it before the invasion or should we wait for the invasion – but the two sides together, Democrats and Republicans, are what we will do. ”

A GOP proposal. Republicans in the Senate, not agreeing to a bipartisan resolution, introduced their own sanctions bill on Tuesday, which Democrats slammed as political currency because it includes many of the things that were in the bipartisan bill.

The Republican bill is called the Never Yielding Europe’s Territory (NYET) Act.

NYET. pick him up? It is Russian for “no”.

A release about the act stated that it would “mandatory sanctions” on the Nord Stream 2 project “should Russia invade without a waiver”, and that it would also provide $500 million in foreign forces. Putin’s “cronies, enablers and major banks”. Financing for Ukraine Read more from CNN’s Lauren Fox.

Republicans like Idaho Sen. Jim Risk, who introduced the GOP bill, Say if there is an invasion, a bipartisan sanctions bill will be passed quickly.

The White House is taking several steps even without a sanctions package. On Monday, Blinken announced up to $1 billion in loan guarantees to Ukraine.

The US, under executive authorization, will double “funding for US military exercises in Europe” and create a new State Department foreign military funding program for Eastern Europe to “help European allies strengthen their defensive capabilities,” according to a release. be able to help.”

“A new normal.” It could be a long time for Republicans and Democrats to come together on Russia and Ukraine.

NATO’s Stoltenberg told CNN on Thursday that the West will have to live, at some stage, with this more aggressive Russia.

“Whether or not Russia invades Ukraine, what we have seen so far represents a new normal because what we have seen is that Russia is trying to intimidate and intimidate Ukraine with a great deal of war effort. ready to assemble ready troops, but also try to threaten NATO allies,” he said.


Source link

What Do You Think About this News